\u00c7FAR\u00cb KUPTIMI KA AFATI N\u00cbSE PROCEDURA NUK KA FILLUAR?<\/p>\n
Njoftimi i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese i 23 shtatorit 2026 ngre nj\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje thelb\u00ebsore p\u00ebr raportin nd\u00ebrmjet nenit 82 dhe nenit 86 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs. Gjykata ka konstatuar se afati 60-ditor p\u00ebr zgjedhjen e Presidentit ka filluar m\u00eb 8 gusht dhe p\u00ebrfundon m\u00eb 6 tetor 2026.<\/p>\n
Por pyetja kryesore mbetet shum\u00eb e thjesht\u00eb: \u00e7far\u00eb kuptimi ka afati 60-ditor n\u00ebse procedura p\u00ebr zgjedhjen e Presidentit nuk ka filluar fare?<\/p>\n
N\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn, dhe ve\u00e7an\u00ebrisht n\u00eb t\u00eb drejt\u00ebn kushtetuese, faktet kan\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsi themelore. Norma p\u00ebrcakton faktet q\u00eb duhet t\u00eb ndodhin p\u00ebr t\u00eb lindur pasoja t\u00eb caktuara juridike. Vet\u00ebm pasi t\u00eb ndodh\u00eb fakti i parashikuar nga norma mund t\u00eb filloj\u00eb afati q\u00eb lidhet me at\u00eb fakt dhe, n\u00eb fund, t\u00eb prodhohet pasoja juridike.<\/p>\n
Neni 82.1(3) ka pik\u00ebrisht k\u00ebt\u00eb logjik\u00eb. Kushtetuta nuk p\u00ebrcakton thjesht se Kuvendi shp\u00ebrndahet pas kalimit t\u00eb 60 dit\u00ebve. Kushtetuta p\u00ebrcakton se Kuvendi shp\u00ebrndahet n\u00ebse Presidenti nuk zgjidhet brenda 60 dit\u00ebve \u201cnga dita e fillimit t\u00eb procedur\u00ebs s\u00eb zgjedhjes s\u00eb Presidentit\u201d.<\/p>\n
Pra, norma s\u00eb pari p\u00ebrcakton faktin, fillimin e procedur\u00ebs dhe pastaj p\u00ebrcakton afatin prej 60 dit\u00ebsh. Jo t\u00eb kund\u00ebrt\u00ebn. Afati nuk e krijon faktin. Fakti e aktivizon afatin.<\/p>\n
Afatet, p\u00ebr nga vet\u00eb natyra juridike, vlejn\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb ardhmen nga momenti kur ndodh fakti q\u00eb i aktivizon. Afatet p\u00ebrcaktojn\u00eb periudh\u00ebn brenda s\u00eb cil\u00ebs nj\u00eb veprim duhet t\u00eb nd\u00ebrmerret ose nj\u00eb procedur\u00eb duhet t\u00eb p\u00ebrfundoj\u00eb. Prandaj, n\u00ebse procedura p\u00ebr zgjedhjen e Presidentit nuk ka filluar, lind pyetja: nga cili fakt juridik ka filluar t\u00eb rrjedh\u00eb afati?<\/p>\n
Afati nuk mund t’i paraprij\u00eb procesit q\u00eb duhet ta afatizoj\u00eb. Nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb afati q\u00eb krijon procedur\u00ebn; fillimi i procedur\u00ebs e aktivizon afatin.<\/p>\n
Kjo \u00e7\u00ebshtje b\u00ebhet edhe m\u00eb serioze kur pasoja \u00ebsht\u00eb shp\u00ebrndarja e Kuvendit, pra p\u00ebrfundimi i mandatit t\u00eb organit p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsues t\u00eb dal\u00eb nga zgjedhjet. N\u00eb nj\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje t\u00eb till\u00eb nuk mund t\u00eb krijohen p\u00ebrmes interpretimit afate ose situata q\u00eb \u00e7ojn\u00eb n\u00eb shp\u00ebrndarjen e Kuvendit pa ndodhur faktet q\u00eb vet\u00eb Kushtetuta i p\u00ebrcakton.<\/p>\n
Neni 86 p\u00ebrcakton procedur\u00ebn p\u00ebr zgjedhjen e Presidentit: kandidaturat, votimet dhe, n\u00ebse \u00ebsht\u00eb e nevojshme, votimin e tret\u00eb. Neni 86.6 e lidh shp\u00ebrndarjen e Kuvendit me nj\u00eb fakt konkret: d\u00ebshtimin e zgjedhjes edhe n\u00eb votimin e tret\u00eb.<\/p>\n
P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye, nenet 82 dhe 86 duhet t\u00eb lexohen s\u00eb bashku. Neni 82 p\u00ebrcakton afatin dhe pasoj\u00ebn, nd\u00ebrsa neni 86 p\u00ebrcakton procedur\u00ebn dhe faktet q\u00eb duhet t’i paraprijn\u00eb asaj pasoje. Asnj\u00ebra prej k\u00ebtyre dispozitave nuk mund t\u00eb lexohet n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb ta b\u00ebj\u00eb t\u00eb panevojshme tjetr\u00ebn.<\/p>\n
Rendi kushtetues \u00ebsht\u00eb i qart\u00eb. S\u00eb pari duhet t\u00eb ndodh\u00eb fakti q\u00eb e parasheh Kushtetuta, pastaj t\u00eb filloj\u00eb procedura dhe t\u00eb rrjedh\u00eb afati brenda t\u00eb cilit procedura duhet t\u00eb p\u00ebrfundoj\u00eb. Vet\u00ebm pas zhvillimit t\u00eb procedur\u00ebs mund t\u00eb konstatohet n\u00ebse zgjedhja ka pasur sukses apo ka d\u00ebshtuar dhe, mbi k\u00ebt\u00eb baz\u00eb, t\u00eb lind\u00eb pasoja kushtetuese.<\/p>\n
Nuk mund t\u00eb veprohet n\u00eb rend t\u00eb kund\u00ebrt: t\u00eb caktohet fillimisht nj\u00eb afat, t\u00eb lejohet kalimi i afatit pa u zhvilluar fare procedura dhe pastaj vet\u00ebm kalimi i koh\u00ebs t\u00eb konsiderohet i mjaftuesh\u00ebm p\u00ebr shp\u00ebrndarjen e Kuvendit. Afati nuk mund ta krijoj\u00eb faktin q\u00eb nuk ka ndodhur.<\/p>\n
Kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb ve\u00e7an\u00ebrisht e r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme kur pasoja \u00ebsht\u00eb shp\u00ebrndarja e Kuvendit. Nj\u00eb pasoj\u00eb e till\u00eb duhet t\u00eb mb\u00ebshtetet n\u00eb fakte kushtetuese t\u00eb qarta dhe t\u00eb verifikueshme, jo n\u00eb fakte t\u00eb supozuara. N\u00ebse procedura nuk ka filluar dhe votimet nuk jan\u00eb zhvilluar, nuk mund t\u00eb konsiderohet se procedura ka d\u00ebshtuar vet\u00ebm sepse ka kaluar nj\u00eb periudh\u00eb e caktuar kohore.<\/p>\n
S\u00eb pari duhet t\u00eb ndodh\u00eb fakti, pastaj fillon afati. Jo afati t\u00eb kaloj\u00eb dhe pastaj t\u00eb konsiderohet se fakti ka ndodhur.<\/p>\n
Pik\u00ebrisht k\u00ebtu paraqitet edhe nj\u00eb rrezik institucional q\u00eb nuk duhet n\u00ebnvler\u00ebsuar. N\u00ebse pranohet se afati mund t\u00eb rrjedh\u00eb edhe pa filluar procedura dhe se vet\u00ebm kalimi i afatit mund t\u00eb \u00e7oj\u00eb n\u00eb shp\u00ebrndarjen e Kuvendit, at\u00ebher\u00eb pasiviteti institucional mund t\u00eb prodhoj\u00eb vet\u00eb pasoja kushtetuese.<\/p>\n
Dhe k\u00ebtu lind nj\u00eb pyetje tjet\u00ebr: kush garanton se ky pasivitet nuk mund t\u00eb jet\u00eb i q\u00ebllimsh\u00ebm?<\/p>\n
N\u00ebse mosveprimi \u00ebsht\u00eb i mjaftuesh\u00ebm q\u00eb afati t\u00eb kaloj\u00eb dhe t\u00eb prodhoj\u00eb pasoja kushtetuese, krijohet mund\u00ebsia q\u00eb nj\u00eb rezultat q\u00eb nuk arrihet p\u00ebrmes procedur\u00ebs kushtetuese t\u00eb tentohet t\u00eb arrihet p\u00ebrmes pasivitetit dhe kalimit t\u00eb koh\u00ebs. Nj\u00eb veprim i till\u00eb mund t’i b\u00ebj\u00eb afatet kushtetuese t\u00eb cenueshme ndaj instrumentalizimit politik dhe, n\u00eb vend q\u00eb t\u00eb zgjidh\u00eb bllokadat institucionale, mund t\u00eb prodhoj\u00eb bllokada t\u00eb reja.<\/p>\n
Kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb arsyeja pse faktet kushtetuese jan\u00eb kaq t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme. Nuk mund t\u00eb d\u00ebshtoj\u00eb nj\u00eb procedur\u00eb q\u00eb nuk ka filluar. Nuk mund t\u00eb d\u00ebshtoj\u00eb nj\u00eb votim q\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb zhvilluar. Dhe nuk mund t\u00eb prodhohet shp\u00ebrndarja e Kuvendit duke e z\u00ebvend\u00ebsuar faktin kushtetues me kalimin mekanik t\u00eb koh\u00ebs.<\/p>\n
Prandaj, pyetja nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb vet\u00ebm n\u00ebse kan\u00eb kaluar 60 dit\u00ebt. Para k\u00ebsaj pyetjeje duhet t\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigjemi: A ka filluar procedura? Cili \u00ebsht\u00eb fakti juridik q\u00eb d\u00ebshmon fillimin e procedur\u00ebs? Kur ka ndodhur ky fakt? Dhe a jan\u00eb zhvilluar veprimet q\u00eb Kushtetuta k\u00ebrkon p\u00ebrpara se t\u00eb prodhohet pasoja e shp\u00ebrndarjes?<\/p>\n
N\u00eb fund, nuk mjafton vet\u00ebm t\u00eb ekzistoj\u00eb nj\u00eb vendim. Nj\u00eb vendim kushtetues duhet t\u00eb mb\u00ebshtetet n\u00eb tekstin e Kushtetut\u00ebs, n\u00eb faktet juridike dhe, mbi t\u00eb gjitha, n\u00eb logjik\u00ebn kushtetuese. Kushtetuta nuk funksionon vet\u00ebm p\u00ebrmes num\u00ebrimit t\u00eb dit\u00ebve. Rendi kushtetues funksionon p\u00ebrmes normave, fakteve, procedurave dhe pasojave q\u00eb duhet t\u00eb ndjekin nj\u00ebra-tjetr\u00ebn n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb logjike dhe kushtetuese.<\/p>\n
N\u00ebse ky rend p\u00ebrmbyset, interpretimi mekanik i afateve, n\u00eb vend q\u00eb t\u00eb zgjidh\u00eb problemin, mund t\u00eb prodhoj\u00eb absurditete juridike dhe bllokada t\u00eb reja institucionale.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u00c7FAR\u00cb KUPTIMI KA AFATI N\u00cbSE PROCEDURA NUK KA FILLUAR? Njoftimi i Gjykat\u00ebs Kushtetuese i 23 shtatorit 2026 ngre nj\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje thelb\u00ebsore p\u00ebr raportin nd\u00ebrmjet nenit 82 dhe nenit 86 t\u00eb Kushtetut\u00ebs. Gjykata ka konstatuar se afati 60-ditor p\u00ebr zgjedhjen e Presidentit ka filluar m\u00eb 8 gusht dhe p\u00ebrfundon m\u00eb 6 tetor 2026. Por pyetja kryesore […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":244992,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"tmauthors":[136],"class_list":["post-244991","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-opinion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiostargjilan.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244991","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiostargjilan.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiostargjilan.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiostargjilan.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiostargjilan.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=244991"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/radiostargjilan.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244991\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":244993,"href":"https:\/\/radiostargjilan.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244991\/revisions\/244993"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiostargjilan.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/244992"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiostargjilan.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=244991"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiostargjilan.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=244991"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiostargjilan.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=244991"},{"taxonomy":"tmauthors","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiostargjilan.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tmauthors?post=244991"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}