Kolegji i Gjykat\u00ebs Supreme t\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs ka aprovuar si t\u00eb themelt\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebpadin\u00eb padit\u00ebses N.M., t\u00eb paraqitur kund\u00ebr Komisionit Qendror t\u00eb Zgjedhjeve (KQZ), duke shpallur t\u00eb paligjshme dhe shfuqizuar pik\u00ebn 5.2.3 t\u00eb Shtojc\u00ebs 1 dhe nenin 7 t\u00eb Rregullores s\u00eb Brendshme nr. 01\/2026 p\u00ebr ndryshimin dhe plot\u00ebsimin e Rregullores s\u00eb Brendshme nr. 07\/2024 p\u00ebr Organizimin e Brendsh\u00ebm dhe Sistematizimin e Vendeve t\u00eb Pun\u00ebs n\u00eb KQZ.<\/p>\n
Padit\u00ebsja N.M. parashtroi padi n\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebn Supreme, duke k\u00ebrkuar shfuqizimin e pjessh\u00ebm t\u00eb Rregullores s\u00eb Brendshme nr. 01\/2026, konkretisht t\u00eb Shtojc\u00ebs 1, pika 5.2.3, q\u00eb i referohet pozit\u00ebs s\u00eb saj, si dhe t\u00eb nenit 7 t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj Rregulloreje.
\nPas shqyrtimit t\u00eb padis\u00eb, p\u00ebrgjigjes s\u00eb t\u00eb paditur\u00ebs t\u00eb paraqitur n\u00eb seanc\u00eb, deklarimeve t\u00eb pal\u00ebve, provave t\u00eb administruara gjat\u00eb shqyrtimit gjyq\u00ebsor publik dhe analizimit t\u00eb dispozitave kushtetuese, ligjore dhe n\u00ebnligjore relevante, Gjykata Supreme ka vler\u00ebsuar se k\u00ebrkes\u00ebpadia e padit\u00ebses \u00ebsht\u00eb e themelt\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Objekt i vler\u00ebsimit gjyq\u00ebsor ishte n\u00ebse, gjat\u00eb zbatimit t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj Rregulloreje, ndaj padit\u00ebses ishte b\u00ebr\u00eb trajtim i pabarabart\u00eb n\u00eb raport me punonj\u00ebsit e tjer\u00eb q\u00eb ndodheshin n\u00eb situat\u00eb t\u00eb krahasueshme. Gjykata konstatoi trajtim t\u00eb pabarabart\u00eb ndaj padit\u00ebses.<\/p>\n
Padit\u00ebsja ushtronte pozit\u00ebn e \u201cZyrtares s\u00eb lart\u00eb p\u00ebr planifikim dhe hulumtime zgjedhore\u201d, n\u00eb kuad\u00ebr t\u00eb Divizionit p\u00ebr Trajnim dhe Analiza Zgjedhore.<\/p>\n
Gjykata ka konstatuar se, me Rregulloren e kontestuar, disa pozita t\u00eb KQZ-s\u00eb, t\u00eb cilat m\u00eb par\u00eb ishin t\u00eb p\u00ebrfshira n\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn klas\u00eb, jan\u00eb ri-klasifikuar n\u00eb klas\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb lart\u00eb dhe kan\u00eb p\u00ebrfituar nga rritja p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse e pag\u00ebs.
\nN\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn koh\u00eb, pozita e padit\u00ebses nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb proces ri-klasifikimi dhe as nuk ka p\u00ebrfituar nga rritja e pag\u00ebs.<\/p>\n
Sipas Gjykat\u00ebs, arsyetimi i KQZ-s\u00eb se klasifikimi i pozitave \u00ebsht\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb mbi baz\u00ebn e p\u00ebrshkrimit t\u00eb detyrave t\u00eb pun\u00ebs nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb i mjaftuesh\u00ebm pa u paraqitur nj\u00eb vler\u00ebsim konkret i pozit\u00ebs s\u00eb padit\u00ebses dhe i pozitave t\u00eb tjera t\u00eb ri-klasifikuara.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb drejtim, Gjykata ka vler\u00ebsuar se, n\u00ebse KQZ-ja pretendon se pozitat e tjera jan\u00eb rivler\u00ebsuar mbi baz\u00ebn e kritereve t\u00eb caktuara, duhet t\u00eb ekzistoj\u00eb dokumentacion q\u00eb d\u00ebshmon se cilat kritere jan\u00eb p\u00ebrdorur gjat\u00eb k\u00ebtij vler\u00ebsimi dhe p\u00ebrse pozita e padit\u00ebses \u00ebsht\u00eb l\u00ebn\u00eb jasht\u00eb procesit t\u00eb ri-klasifikimit.<\/p>\n
Gjykata ka vler\u00ebsuar gjithashtu se argumenti se p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsit\u00eb e pozitave t\u00eb tjera jan\u00eb t\u00eb ndryshme nga ato t\u00eb padit\u00ebses nuk e justifikon vetvetiu trajtimin e ndrysh\u00ebm, p\u00ebrderisa nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb d\u00ebshmuar me prova konkrete se cilat elemente t\u00eb detyrave dhe p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsive jan\u00eb marr\u00eb parasysh gjat\u00eb klasifikimit.<\/p>\n
Gjykata Supreme ka ardhur n\u00eb p\u00ebrfundim se padit\u00ebses i \u00ebsht\u00eb cenuar e drejta p\u00ebr barazi para ligjit dhe p\u00ebr mbrojtje t\u00eb barabart\u00eb ligjore, pasi ajo \u00ebsht\u00eb trajtuar n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb pabarabart\u00eb n\u00eb raport me zyrtar\u00eb t\u00eb tjer\u00eb q\u00eb ndodheshin n\u00eb situat\u00eb t\u00eb krahasueshme, pa u paraqitur nj\u00eb arsyetim objektiv dhe i arsyesh\u00ebm p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb trajtim t\u00eb ndrysh\u00ebm.<\/p>\n
Sipas Gjykat\u00ebs, fakti q\u00eb detyrat e pozit\u00ebs s\u00eb padit\u00ebses nuk jan\u00eb identike me ato t\u00eb pozitave t\u00eb tjera nuk mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrb\u00ebj\u00eb, n\u00eb vetvete, justifikim t\u00eb mjaftuesh\u00ebm p\u00ebr trajtim t\u00eb ndrysh\u00ebm, n\u00eb munges\u00eb t\u00eb provave konkrete q\u00eb e arsyetojn\u00eb nj\u00eb dallim t\u00eb till\u00eb.<\/p>\n
P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye, Gjykata Supreme ka vler\u00ebsuar se rregullimi i b\u00ebr\u00eb p\u00ebrmes aktit n\u00ebnligjor, n\u00eb pjes\u00ebn q\u00eb ka sjell\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb trajtim t\u00eb ndrysh\u00ebm ndaj padit\u00ebses, nuk mund t\u00eb q\u00ebndroj\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Po ashtu, Gjykata ka shfuqizuar nenin 7 t\u00eb Rregullores s\u00eb Brendshme nr. 01\/2026, t\u00eb miratuar me Vendimin nr. 01\/1444-2026, t\u00eb dat\u00ebs 9 korrik 2026, pasi ka konstatuar se kjo dispozit\u00eb ka cenuar t\u00eb drejtat e padit\u00ebses duke p\u00ebrcaktuar ndryshime n\u00eb p\u00ebrshkrimin dhe klasifikimin e pozitave, ku disa pozita jan\u00eb riklasifikuar dhe u jan\u00eb p\u00ebrcaktuar detyra t\u00eb reja, nd\u00ebrsa pozita e padit\u00ebses ka mbetur jasht\u00eb k\u00ebtij procesi, si n\u00eb aspektin e klasifikimit, ashtu edhe t\u00eb pag\u00ebs.<\/p>\n
Linku i komunikat\u00ebs: https:\/\/supreme.gjyqesori-rks.org\/2026\/09\/29\/gjykata-supreme-shfuqizon-dispozitat-e-rregullores-se-kqz-se-per-trajtimin-e-pabarabarte-te-n-m\/<\/p>\n
Linku i aktgjykimit: https:\/\/supreme.gjyqesori-rks.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/verdicts\/SUP__24_2026_SQ.pdf<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kolegji i Gjykat\u00ebs Supreme t\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs ka aprovuar si t\u00eb themelt\u00eb k\u00ebrkes\u00ebpadin\u00eb padit\u00ebses N.M., t\u00eb paraqitur kund\u00ebr Komisionit Qendror t\u00eb Zgjedhjeve (KQZ), duke shpallur t\u00eb paligjshme dhe shfuqizuar pik\u00ebn 5.2.3 t\u00eb Shtojc\u00ebs 1 dhe nenin 7 t\u00eb Rregullores s\u00eb Brendshme nr. 01\/2026 p\u00ebr ndryshimin dhe plot\u00ebsimin e Rregullores s\u00eb Brendshme nr. 07\/2024 p\u00ebr Organizimin e […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":245435,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"tmauthors":[136],"class_list":["post-245434","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-lajme"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiostargjilan.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/245434","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiostargjilan.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiostargjilan.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiostargjilan.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiostargjilan.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=245434"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/radiostargjilan.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/245434\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":245437,"href":"https:\/\/radiostargjilan.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/245434\/revisions\/245437"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiostargjilan.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/245435"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/radiostargjilan.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=245434"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiostargjilan.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=245434"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiostargjilan.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=245434"},{"taxonomy":"tmauthors","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/radiostargjilan.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tmauthors?post=245434"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}